Because phenomena, as understood phenomenologically, are never anything but what goes to make up Being, while Being is in every case the Being of some entity, we must first bring forward the entities themselves if it is our aim that Being should be laid bare; and we must do this in the right way. These entities must likewise show themselves with the kind of access which genuinely belongs to them. And in this way, the ordinary conception of the phenomenon becomes phenomenologically relevant. If our analysis is to be authentic, its aim is such that the primary task of assuring ourselves ‘phenomenologically’ of that entity, which serves as our example, has already been prescribed as our point of departure.
top of page
Search
Recent Posts
See AllInstruments to-knowledge are conflating the body, the brain, with all its visceral components speeds up in parallel to the s speed...
160
There are three critical aspects to the conception about death. The first and most apparent revolves around those values or beliefs that...
243
The ‘death of God’ is the second notion. Belief in God – and the values that go with such belief – is no longer possible or relevant...
110
bottom of page
Comments